Dismissed

State of Chhattisgarh v. Vijay Pratap Singh

Chhattisgarh HC12 Jun 2023WPCR/8/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed five writ petitions filed by the State for quashing an order. The petitions were declared infructuous after the court recorded that the underlying criminal cases against the respondents had concluded in acquittal. No substantive legal principle was established.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions were dismissed as infructuous due to the acquittal of respondents in the connected criminal cases.

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Vijay… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Chhattisgarh HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPCR No. 7 of 2007

¶5

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Kanker, District North Bastar, Kanker (CG)

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

Vinod Kumar Pawar, S/o Tejram Pawar, R/o New Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District Durg (CG)

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

WPCR No. 8 of 2007

¶11

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Kanker, District North Bastar, Kanker (CG)

¶12

---- Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

Vijay Pratap Singh S/o. Baldeo Singh Bagga, R/o. New Market Dallirajahara, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (CG)

¶15

---- Respondent

¶16

WPCR No. 9 of 2007

¶17

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Kanker, District North Bastar, Kanker (CG)

¶18

---- Petitioner

¶19

Versus

¶20

Ajay Pratap Singh, S/o Baldeo Singh Bagga, R/o. New Market Dallirajahara, Tahsil Balod, District-Durg (CG)

¶21

---- Respondent

¶22

WPCR No. 10 of 2007

¶23

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Kanker, District North Bastar, Kanker (CG)

¶24

---- Petitioner

¶25

Versus

¶26

Sukh Chain Singh S/o Late Karnail Singh, R/o C.C.M.T.P. Nagar,

¶27

¶28

Bhilai, District-Durg (CG)

¶29

---- Respondent

¶30

WPCR No. 11 of 2007

¶31

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Kanker, District North Bastar, Kanker (CG)

¶32

---- Petitioner

¶33

Versus

¶34

Sukh Chain Singh S/o Late Karnail Singh, R/o C.C.M.T.P. Nagar, Bhilai, District-Durg (CG)

¶35

---- Respondent

¶36

And

¶37

WPCR No. 12 of 2007

¶38

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Kanker, District North Bastar, Kanker (CG)

¶39

---- Petitioner

¶40

Versus

¶41

Gyan Chand Lunia, S/o. Ganeshmal Lunia, R/o. Dallirajahara, Tahsil Balod, District-Durg (CG)

¶42

---- Respondent

¶43

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶44

For Petitioner/State : Mr. H.S.Ahluwalia, Deputy Advocate General For Respondents : Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate

¶45

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

¶46

Hon'ble Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey, Judge

¶47

Order on Board

¶48

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

¶49

12.06.2023

¶50

Heard Mr. H.S.Ahluwalia, learned Deputy Advocate General for the

¶51

¶52

petitioner/State. Also heard Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Anil Singh Rajput, learned counsel for the respondents.

¶53

2. The present writ petitions have been filed by the petitioner/State for quashment of the impugned order dated 29.9.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Kanker in Criminal Revision No.43/2006 and other connected matters.

¶54

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the respondents were prosecuted for the offences in question in which the confiscation proceedings were drawn and the trucks in question were seized. It is stated that the said criminal cases, which were registered, have ended in acquittal of the respondents. They have filed the copies of acquittal orders of the respondents.

¶55

4 . The aforesaid orders are taken on record.

¶56

5 . In that view of the matter, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

¶57

Sd/- Sd/-

¶58

(Rakesh Mohan Pandey ) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice

¶59

Bablu

State of Chhattisgarh v. Vijay Pratap Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State of Chhattisgarh v. Vijay Pratap Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Kumar Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sarita Adiley Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Nagma Faiz Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Satya Prakash Verma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Janak Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Emla Hunga Vs State of Chhattisgarh