Petitioners failed to appear or file representation during booking rounds. The Division Bench held the Writ Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 638 of 202 2
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : None. For Respondent-State : Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Govt. Advocate
Division Bench
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Order on Board (21.07.2023)
1. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner even in the passover round. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was taken up in two rounds. It appears that petitioners are not interested in further prosecuting this matter.
2. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution .
Sd/Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge
s@if
Dr. Kuldip Kumar Solanki
Deepanshi Solanki
State of Chhattisgarh
National Medical Commission
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Radhakishan Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
