from the revenue record. He would further submit that the Tahsildar/ respondent No.2 allowed the application of respondent No.6 vide order dated 19.8.2021 (Annexure P/2) for deleting the name of petitioner. Thereafter, an appeal was preferred by the petitioner before the SDO (Revenue), Saja, District Bemetara (C.G.) and the same was allowed vide order dated 17.5.2023 (Annexure P/3) and the order passed by the Tahsildar was set-aside. Subsequently, respondent No.6 preferred a second appeal before the Commissioner, Durg / respondent No.4 and the same was allowed vide order dated 24.8.2023 (Annexure P/4) and the order passed by First Appellate Authority/ SDO (Revenue) was rejected. Against which petitioner preferred a revision before the Board of Revenue Chhattisgarh / Respondent No.5 which was dismissed vide order dated 10.10.2023 (Annexure P/1). He would also submit that civil suit with regard to subject land is also pending, therefore, the Revenue Court ought to have not acted upon for deleting the name of petitioner as natural gaurdian (wali) of respondent No.6. Hence, this petiton.