The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition challenging an appellate order rejecting an application for a temporary injunction in a property suit. The Court held that the lower courts' findings were neither perverse nor contrary to the record.
Writ petition dismissed confirming the rejection of the application for temporary injunction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 3
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 933 of 2023
Bhuneshwar Prasad S/o Ramsingh Dhimar Aged About 80 Years Resident Of Village- Baraunda, Post- Bangoli (Wrongly Mentioned As Bangali), Tahsil- Kharora, District- Raipur (C.G.) (Plaintiff)
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Advocate For State : Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, Government Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
24.11.2023
Page 2 of 3
been rejected.
Page 3 of 3
favour of the plaintiff. Thereafter, the plaintiff has preferred an appeal which has also been dismissed by the Appellate Court affirming the findings recorded by the learned Trial Court.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Manish
2 issues framed by the court
Whether this Court should interfere with the order of the subordinate court that rejected the plea for a temporary injunction?
Whether the findings recorded by the courts below regarding the balance of convenience and prima facie case warrant interference under Article 227?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bhuneshwar Prasad
Smt. Radha Verma
Smt. Pratibha Verma
Pawan Kumar Verma
Raghavendra Verma
State Of Chhattisgarh
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
