High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition challenging the Trial Court order allowing amendment in the plaint, finding no ground for interference.
Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 931 of 2023
For Petitioner : Mr. Abhijeet Sarkar, Advocate For State : Mr. Virendra Bajpai, Government Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board
24.11.2023
Page 2 of 2
just and proper adjudication of the case, accordingly, the same has been allowed. The learned Trial has also given liberty to the defendant/petitioner to consequential amend their pleadings made in the written statement.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Manish
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition against the amendment of plaint allowed by the Trial Court has merit.
Samme Lal Son Of Tikait Ram And Others
Shanti Devi Agrawal
State Of Chhattisgarh
Naib Tahsildar Barpalli
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
