High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected a bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC. The court refused to enlarge the applicant on regular bail due to the nature of the serious allegations involved, despite arguments regarding delay in the FIR.
Application under Section 439 CrPC rejected; bail denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 8597 of 2023
------Applicant
VERSUS
------- Non-applicant
For Applicant : Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate. For Non-applicant : Mr. G.I. Sharan, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD
20/12/2023
2
with victim from 15.09.2019 at that time age of victim was about 16 years and 11 months only. There are serious allegations levelled by the victim in her report as also statement recorded under Section 161 of CrPC. He also submits that victim stood with the allegation as levelled in the report while recording her court statement.
Sd/(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
/pwn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is fit to be enlarged on regular bail under Section 439 CrPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Golu Yadav
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
