The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed an application seeking correction of a typographical error in a previous order, directing that an erroneous reference to Section 439 be treated as Section 125.
The criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed; paragraph 1 of the previous order is to be disregarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2023:CGHC:33401
NAFR
HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRR No. 38 of 2023
VERSUS
For Applicant : Mr. Vivek Mishra, Advocate
For Non-applicant-State : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD
19/12/2023
2
2023:CGHC:33401
Sd/(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
Dey
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 486 of 2024
---- Applicant Versus
---- Non-Applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Vivek Mishra, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Order On Board
04/03/2024
2
this Court for consideration along with this CRMP, the CRMP is allowed.
Certified copy of the order today.
Shayna
Sd/(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow correction of typographical error regarding the section cited in a previous order.
Shri Suprit Samuel
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
