Ajay Kumar Panchal v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application declared infructuous because the applicant has been convicted in the trial court. Bail was not granted.
Bail application declared infructuous because the applicant has been convicted in the trial court. Bail was not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 5921 of 2023
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Non-applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate. For State/Non-applicant : Mr. Dinesh Tiwari, G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board
10.11.2023
1. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that applicant has been convicted by the learned trial Court, hence this bail application has become infructuous.
2. Learned State counsel has no objection to allow the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.
3. Accordingly, the bail application is having rendered become infructuous.
Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge
Deepti Jha
Ajay Kumar Panchal
State Of Chhattisgarh
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court