Naresh Jangde v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant claimed the bail application was infructuous due to his acquittal in the lower court, which both parties accepted.
The applicant claimed the bail application was infructuous due to his acquittal in the lower court, which both parties accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 5599 of 2023
Versus
For Applicant :- Ms. M. Asha, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Anil Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent-State :- Mr. Priyanshu Gupta, PL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board
07.11.2023
SD/-
( Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Judge
Ayushi
Naresh Jangde
State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House Officer, Police Station - Dabhra
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court