Allowed

Israr Salim v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC18 Aug 2023MCRC/4422/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

SingleJudge order granting regular bail to Israr Salim under Section 439 CrPC accused of fraud under IPC. Court emphasized that main accused and co-accused had already been released and trial would take time, directing release on personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two local sureties of the like sum before the trial Court.

Israr Salim Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2023)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

MCRC No. 4422 of 2023

¶4

Israr Salim S/o Abdul Khaddus Aged About 33 Years R/o 262/1, K.S.F.C. Layout, Kanak Das Banglore North Karnatak- 560084

¶5

---- Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Mujgahan District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶8

---- Respondent

¶9

For Applicant : Shri Manish Nigam, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Kashif Shakeel, Dy AG

¶10

Hon'ble Smt Justice Rajani Dubey

¶11

Order on Board

¶12

18.08.2023

¶13

Applicant has preferred this First bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection with Crime No.105 of 2022, registered at Police Station- Mujgahan, district- Raipur (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 419, 420, 409, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, and 34 of the IPC.

¶14

Case of the prosecution in brief, is that complainant has lodged report to the concerned Police Station that present applicant along with other coaccused persons, committed fraud by transferring money using account No.922010025774139, which belongs to CG State Agriculture Marketing (Mandi) Board, Raipur. On the basis of complaint, FIR has been registered against the applicant and other co-accused persons.

¶15

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that main accused has already been released on bail by the Court below and other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.07.2023 passed in MCRC-10980, 10940 and 5285 of 2023. Applicant is in

¶16

Mcrc 4422 of 2023

¶17

¶18

jail since 18.04.2023. Charge-sheet has been filed and there is no likelihood of his case being decided in near future, therefore, he may be released on bail.

¶19

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes bail application, and agreed to the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that other co-accused persons including the main accused have been granted bail by this Court.

¶20

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

¶21

Considering facts and circumstances of the case, and further considering the fact that main accused and other co-accused persons have already been granted bail, and the trial may take some time, without further commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, bail application is allowed.

¶23

It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) with two local sureties of the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.

¶24

Certified copy as per rules.

¶25

Sd/(Rajani Dubey) JUDGE

¶26

padma

Israr Salim v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Israr Salim v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohan Lal Thakur Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Smt. Padmini Pandey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Ashwani Sharma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Seema Mandavi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Raghvendra Prasad Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Laxman Gujjar Vs State of Chhattisgarh