Application for bail under IPC and POCSO. Prosecutrix and mother examined and did not support prosecution. Bail allowed due to lack of corroboration and pretrial detention duration.
Release on bail with personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and one surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 2706 of 2023
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Non-Applicant
For Applicant : Shri Rohitashva Singh, Advocate. For Non-Applicant : Ms. Usha Chandrakar, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J
Order On Board
16/06/2023 :
2
been examined before the trial Court and they have not supported the case of the prosecution. He is in jail since 28.4.2022. Considering all these aspects, he may be released on bail.
Sd/(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
Barve
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant arrested for sexual offences under IPC and POCSO should be released on bail considering lack of prosecution support.
Whether the length of pretrial detention justifies bail despite the serious nature of the offences.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Pankaj Nikunj
State Of Chhattisgarh
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
