The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the applicant's petition for condonation of delay in filing a Miscellaneous Commission Ron, restoring a previously stricken suit numbered 267 of 2006 that had been dismissed for want of prosecution.
Condonation of delay in filing MCC and restoration of SA No. 267 of 2006 to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 186 of 20 22
Chaitan Ram S/o Late Kendara Aged About 45 Years Caste- Mahkul, R/o Village Godamba, Tehsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
1- Ishwar S/o Nando, Aged About 45 Years By Caste- Mahkul R/o Village Godamba, Tehsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh
2 - Basudev, S/o Nando, Aged About 40 Years By Caste- Mahkul R/o Village Godamba, Tehsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur,
Chhattisgarh
3 - Jugeshwar, S/o Nando, Aged About 37 Years By Caste- Mahkul R/o Village Godamba, Tehsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh
4 - Roopdhar, S/o Nando, Aged About 35 Years By Caste- Mahkul R/o Village Godamba, Tehsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh
5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh
---- Non-applicants
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Applicant : Mr. Rohitashva Singh, Advocate For Non-applicant No.1, 2 & 4 : Mr. Hemant Gupta, Advocate For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
24. 11.2023
1. Heard on IA No.01/2022, which is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing this MCC.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay in filing this MCC is hereby condoned.
3. Also heard finally.
4. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of SA No.267 of 2006 which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order of this Court dated 18.11.2019.
5. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. SA No.267 of 2006 is restored to its original number.
6. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed .
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
s@if
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the Miscellaneous Commission Ron application should be condoned allowing restoration of the stricken suit.
Chaitan Ram
Ishwar
Basudev
Jugeshwar
Roopdhar
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
