Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the appellants seeking permission to do so.
None. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MAC No. 159 of 2019
All are R/o Village Gadadih, Tahsil/ P.S. Bhatapara, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
---- Appellants
Versus
---- Respondents
For the Appellants : Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate.
For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate.
For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Utkal Pradhan, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
Order on B oard
2
1 8.08.2023
Heard.
Sd/(Arvind Singh Chandel) JUDGE
J/-
Minor Ku. Divya D/o Tekuram Lahre Through Guardian Dharmu Karmakar / Hira Bai / Dharmu Karmakar
Pooran Singh Sen
Rikhi Ram
Fudru Ram Through Legal Heirs Sukhi Ram Sahu / Mukhi Ram Sahu / Sargahin Bai
Teku Ram Lahre
Tata A.I.G. General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
