Abdul Nazib v. Rajendra Khandekar
Case brief
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Cr.M.P. No. 202 of…
What did the court decide?
Leave to appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC allowed; Registry directed to register Cr.M.P. as Acquittal Appeal.
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Cr.M.P. No. 202 of…
Leave to appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC allowed; Registry directed to register Cr.M.P. as Acquittal Appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Cr.M.P. No. 202 of 2023
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondent
| For Appellant | : Shri Rajendra Kumar Patel, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent | : None |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Order On Board
17/08/2023
Heard on admission.
Sd/(Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge
Prakash
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC should be granted in this Cr.M.P.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abdul Nazib
Rajendra Khandekar
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court