Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Roopsing Vs Smt.Anitabai and Anr. — Chhattisgarh HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

Home
Chhattisgarh HC
2023
Roopsing Vs Smt.Anitabai and Anr.Roopsing v. Smt.Anitabai and Anr.

Dismissed

Roopsing v. Smt.Anitabai and Anr.

Chhattisgarh HC1 Feb 2023CRR/181/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner withdrew criminal revision petition CRR No.181 of 2012. Court dismissed the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Criminal revision CRR No.181 of 2012 stands dismissed as withdrawn.

What the court decided

AI extract

Cite this judgement

Roopsing v. Smt.Anitabai and Anr., CRR/181/2012 (CG), decided on 1 February 2023.

The High Court of Chhattisgarh publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Radhakishan Agrawal

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Criminal revision CRR No.181 of 2012 stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The criminal revision petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner without any substantive disposal of legal merits.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

CRR No.181 of 2012

Roopsingh, S/o Gangaram Yadav, aged about 27 years, Occupation Cultivation, R/o Village Ramhepur, Police Station And Tahsil Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham, C.G.

----Petitioner

Versus

Smt. Anitabai, W/o Roopsingh Yadav, aged about 25 years, Occupation Nil, R/o Village Ramhepur, Police Station and Tashil Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham, C.G.

Kumari Parwati, D/o Roopsingh Yadav, aged about 1 and half month, minor through her natural guardian mother Smt. Anita Bai, W/o Roopsing Yadav, R/o Village Ramhepur, Police Station and Tashil Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham, C.G.

---- Respondents

For Petitioner Mr. Amit Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.P. Sahu, Advocate. For Respondents None.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board

01.02.2023

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to prosecute this criminal revision and seeks to withdraw the same.

Accordingly, the criminal revision stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge

Akhilesh

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Roopsingh, S/o Gangaram Yadav
respondent
Smt. Anitabai, W/o Roopsingh Yadav
respondent
Kumari Parwati, D/o Roopsingh Yadav

Coram

AI extract

Radhakishan Agrawal

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Chhattisgarh HC
Decided on: 1 Feb 2023 · February
Registered: 28 Feb 2012
Case no.: CRR/181/2012
CNR: CGHC010006672012
Bench: Radhakishan Agrawal
Disposal: WITHDRAWN

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Radhakishan Agrawal

Ratan Kumar Mishra Vs Smt.Shyamlata Mishra and Anr.
31 Jan 2023
Naindas and Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh
31 Jan 2023
Sunita and Ors. Vs Krishna Das
31 Jan 2023
Gulam Mohammad Vs State of Chhattisgarh
1 Feb 2023
Bishat Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh
1 Feb 2023
Abhilasha Singh @ Charu Singh Vs Gunjan Kumar
1 Feb 2023