Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sikander Ali Vs Sushma Kothari — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2023)

Home
Chhattisgarh HC
2023
Sikander Ali Vs Sushma KothariSikander Ali v. Sushma Kothari

Dismissed

Sikander Ali v. Sushma Kothari

Chhattisgarh HC20 Dec 2023CRMP/2380/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a petition as infructuous based on counsel's submission.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous.

What the court decided

AI extract

Cite this judgement

Sikander Ali v. Sushma Kothari, CRMP/2380/2023 (CG), decided on 20 December 2023.

The High Court of Chhattisgarh publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Narendra Kumar Vyas

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Petition dismissed as infructuous.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The petition was dismissed as it had become infructuous. No substantive legal principle or detailed reasoning is provided in this order.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

CRMP No. 2380 of 2023

Sikander Ali S/o Namdaar Khan Aged About 72 Years R/o Solhapara Near Ward Number 17 Dongargarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

Akbar Ali S/o Sikander Ali Aged About 42 Years R/o Solhapara Near Ward Number 17 Dongargarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

Smt. Afsari Begum W/o Sikander Ali Aged About 63 Years R/o Solhapara Near Ward Number 17 Dongargarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

Gopal Khemuka S/o Late Amarchand Khemuka Aged About 58 Years R/o Ward Number 15 Dongargarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

Sushma Kothari W/o Om Kothari Aged About 53 Years Counsellor Ward No. 15 Near Jain Mandir, Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon

Rajiv Singh Editor Dainik Bhaskar News Paper, Dainik Bhaskar Raipur

Kamalkant Sharma, ublisher And Printer Dainik Bhaskar News Paper, Rajbandhamaidaanpres Complex Ge Road District Raipur -

--- Respondents

For petitioner : Mr. Arjit Tiwari, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas.

Order on Board

(20-12-2023)

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that this petition has become infrucrtuous.

Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/( Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE

Raju

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Sikander Ali
petitioner
Akbar Ali
petitioner
Afsari Begum
petitioner
Gopal Khemuka
respondent
Sushma Kothari
respondent
Rajiv Singh

Coram

AI extract

Narendra Kumar Vyas

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Chhattisgarh HC
Decided on: 20 Dec 2023 · December
Registered: 13 Oct 2023
Case no.: CRMP/2380/2023
CNR: CGHC010344812023
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: Narendra Kumar Vyas
Disposal: DISMISSED

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Narendra Kumar Vyas

Nakul Ram Vs Dr. Sanjay Kumar Alung
19 Dec 2023
Muzaffar Husain Vs Kasturilal Sharma
19 Dec 2023
Kasturi Lal Sharma Vs Muzaffar Hussain
19 Dec 2023
Raju Singh Thakur Vs Suresh Kumar Sahu
20 Dec 2023
Krishna Kumar Tiwari @ Manharan Lal Tiwari Vs State of Chhattisgarh
20 Dec 2023
Smt. R. Jayashree Vs State of Chhattisgarh
20 Dec 2023