The High Court of Chhattisgarh, in a contempt proceeding, disposed of the petition after accepting the respondents' submission that they had complied with the earlier order and tendered an unconditional apology for the delay, without adjudicating the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONT No. 371 of 2019
---- Applicants
Versus
Page 2 of 2
Family Welfare, Indravati Bhavan, Third Floor, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
---- Respondents
For Applicants : Mr. Alok Kumar Dewangan, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Satish Gupta, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board
06.01.2023
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Arun
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceeding against the respondents should continue despite their submission of unconditional apology for delay in compliance.
Whether the disputed order passed by this Court needs to be adjudicated upon given the tender of apology.
Bhupendra Kumar Gupta and others
Smt. Niharika Barik Singh and others
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
