Smt. Rukmani Devi v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition seeking release of unpaid GPF amount to the petitioner was disposed of. The court noted the petitioner did not appear after the respondent submitted that the balance was already paid, whereby the petition was disposed at this stage.
What the court decided
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 3733 of 2022
Smt. Rukmani Devi, W/o Late Adalsai Prajapati, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village & Post- Petla, Police Station- Sitapur, District- Surguja (C.G.)
- ---- Petitioner
Versus
- State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur (C.G.)
- The Accountant General, Government of Chhattisgarh, Zero Point, Balodabazar Road, Raipur (C.G.)
- The Director, Directorate of Public Instruction, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.)
- The District Education Officer, Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Rukmani Devi
- respondent
State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, School Education Department
- respondent
The Accountant General, Government of Chhattisgarh
- respondent
The Director, Directorate of Public Instruction
- respondent
The District Education Officer, Ambikapur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPS/3733/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court