Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to lack of instructions from the petitioner's counsel.
Petitioner's counsel had no instruction; writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2037 of 2008
Lalit Kumar Sahu, aged 49 years, Son of Late Shri Uttamsingh Sahu, Vyayam (P.T.Sikchhak), Mahatma Gandhi High School, Durg
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Sameer Oraon, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board
15.03.2022
(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
Yogesh
Lalit Kumar Sahu
Municipal Corporation, Durg
The State of Chhattisgarh
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
