An applicant filed a writ petition. The petitioner counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, which was allowed, and the petition was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPCR No. 259 of 2022
Satendra Ram Toppo @ Satendra Kumar, S/o. Sokdo, Aged About 28 Years, R/o. Korandha, Police Station Shankargarh, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.
---Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through the Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali, Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.
---Respondent
| 08.03.2022 | Mr. Goutam Khetrapal with Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, |
|---|---|
| Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Dy. A.G. for the State. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing some time, wants to withdraw the instant writ petition. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|
| Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
|
| Ashok |
Satendra Ram Toppo @ Satendra Kumar
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
