Partly allowed
Shri Ram Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.
Chhattisgarh HCWPC/936/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Reservations of 58% in public employment and educational admissions, together with higher district and divisional quotas, were challenged. The court declared the employment amendment, educational reservation provision and specified Schedule II roster reservations unconstitutional, but preserved existing appointments and admissions. The petitions were allowed, partly allowed or disposed of accordin
What did the court decide?
The 2011 Amendment Act, Section 3 of the 2012 Act and specified Schedule II roster reservations were declared unconstitutional; existing appointments and admissions were preserved.