P.R. Khute and Anr. v. State of C.G. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Reservation of 58% in public employment and educational admissions, and higher district and divisional roster reservations, was challenged. The court declared the impugned provisions unconstitutional but preserved existing appointments and admissions. The petitions were allowed, partly allowed or disposed of accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Amendment Act of 2011, Section 3 of the Act of 2012 and specified Schedule II roster reservations declared unconstitutional; existing appointments and admissions preserved.