Dismissed

M/S Arpit Associates v. Steel Authority of India Limited

Chhattisgarh HC19 Jul 2022WPC/2662/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner's counsel, appearing in WPC No. 2662 of 2021 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, sought withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to approach the Court later if necessary. The Court acceded to the prayer. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition or reasoning is provided.

What the court decided

AI extract

M/S Arpit Associates Vs Steel Authority of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2022)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

	WPC No. 2662 of 2021 M/s Arpit Associates Through Its Proprietor Arpit Vinaik, Aged About 25 Years, S/o A. K. Vinaik, R/o Block-31, Plot -06 Nehru Nagar (East) Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus Steel Authority Of India Limited Bhilai Steel Plant Through Its General Manager, (O And M), Ispat Bhawan, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent
19.07.2022	Mr. Siddharth Rathod, counsel for petitioner. Mr. P. R. Patankar, counsel for respondent. Counsel for petitioner prays for withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to approach the Court in case need so arises at a later stage. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the writ petition, with the aforesaid liberty, stands dismissed as withdrawn.
	Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE

¶4

Khatai

M/S Arpit Associates v. Steel Authority of India Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

M/S Arpit Associates v. Steel Authority of India Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Kumar Tamrakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Khorbaharin Bai Vs Dharminbai

Vijay Shishu Sinha Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sanjay Modi Vs Smt. Kiran Kaushal

Shailesh Singh Kushwaha Vs Chhattisgarh Housingh Board

M/S Gurudev Drugs and Industries Vs State of Chhattisgarh