Dismissed
Firda and Anr. v. Polikar and Anr.
Chhattisgarh HCSA/36/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order dismissed a first appeal for want of prosecution as the learned counsel lacked contact and instruction from the appellants.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
NAFR
¶2
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
¶3
SA No. 36 of 2012
¶4
- Firda D/o Julyus Aged About 30 Years Caste Uraon, R/o Village Bamhani, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
¶5
- Manvel D/o Julyus Aged About 46 Years Caste Uraon, R/o Village Bamhani, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
¶6
---- Appellants
¶7
Versus
¶8
- Polikar S/o Julyus Aged About 58 Years, Caste Uraon, R/o Village Bamhani, Tahsil Duldula, Dist. Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
¶9
- State of C.G. through the Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
¶10
--- Respondents
¶11
For Appellant/s : Mr. R.N. Pusty, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Mr. J.K. Saxena, Advocate. For State/respondent No.2: Mr. T.K. Nande, P.L.
¶12
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Firda D/o Julyus
- appellant
Manvel D/o Julyus
- respondent
Polikar S/o Julyus
- respondent
State of C.G.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/36/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court