Dismissed

Central Board of Trustees v. Ram Lal Sharma

Chhattisgarh HC1 Jul 2022REVP/91/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh, in five consolidated review petitions (Nos. 78, 82, 89, 91, 96 of 2022), rejected them. The court relied on a prior identical order (REVP No. 62/2022) passed on 12.05.2022, emphasizing that the grounds raised were identical in nature and thus required no fresh consideration.

What did the court decide?

The review petitions filed in REVP Nos. 78, 82, 89, 91, and 96 of 2022 are rejected in terms of the order passed in REVP No. 62/2022.

Central Board of Trustees Vs Ram Lal… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶2

Order Sheet

¶3

REVP No. 78 of 2022

¶4

 Central Board Of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization Through - The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Rpfc), Block -D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandi, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Epfo Was Respondent No.1 In Writ Petition)

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Kunwar Singh Dewangan S/o Late S.S. Dewangan Aged About 68 Years R/o In Front Office Michale School, Samta Marg, Govindnagar, District - Kanker Chhattisgarh. Note (Name Wongly Mentioned In Impugned Order As Kunwear Singh Dewangan, The Correct Name Is Kunwar Singh Dewangan)

¶8

2. Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Jadgdalpur, Through Chief Executive Officer, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

REVP No. 82 of 2022

¶11

 Central Board Of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Through - The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Rpfc), BlockD,scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)-492004 (Epfo Was Respondent No. 1 In W.P.(S) No. 2200/2022)

¶12

---- Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

Jivan Lal Sannad S/o Late Shri Padum Lala, Aged About 71 Years R/o Sanichari Para, Bilha, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No. 1 Was Petitioner In Wps No. 2200/2022)

¶15

2. Zila Shakari General Bank, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, Through Its Managing Director Now Chief Executive Officer, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No. 2 Was Respondent No. 2 In Wps No. 2200/2022)

¶16

---- Respondent

¶17

REVP No. 89 of 2022

¶18

 Central Board Of Trustees, Employees Provdent Fund Organization Through The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Rpfc), Block - D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 492004.

¶19

---- Petitioner

¶20

Versus

¶21

V.K. Samuel S/o Shri Saniel Samuel Aged About 67 Years R/o Plot No. 34, New Adarsh Nagar, Potiyakala, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

¶22

2. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Dairy Federation Through Its Managing Director, Urla, Post Bmy Charouda, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

¶23

---- Respondent

¶24

REVP No. 91 of 2022

¶25

 Central Board Of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization, Through - The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Rpfc), Block - D, Scheme No. 32. Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 492004 (Epfo Was Respondent No. 1 In W.P.S. No. 2164/2022

¶26

---- Petitioner

¶27

Versus

¶28

Ram Lal Sharma S/o Shri Ramavtar Sharma, Aged About 66 Years R/o G-6, Dairy Colony, Chhodara Nala, Near Big Bazar, Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) (Respondent No. 1 Was Petitioner In W.P.S. No. 2164/2022)

¶29

2. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Dairy Federation, Through Its Managing Director, Urla, Post-Bmy Charouda, District - Durg (Chhattisgarh) (Respondent No. 2 Was Respondent No. 2 In W.P.S. No. 2164/2022

¶30

---- Respondent

¶31

REVP No. 96 of 2022

¶32

 Central Board Of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization, Through The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, (Rpfc), Block-D, Schme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur, District

¶33

Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 492004 (Epfo Was Respondent No. 1 In W.P.(S) No. 2166/2022), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶34

---- Petitioner

¶35

Versus

¶36

Smt. Premila Naidu W/o Shri Kishore Kumar Naidu, Aged About 67 Years R/o- Vb-11, Jeewan Vihar Colony, Telibandha, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶37

2. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Dairy Federation, Through Its Managing Director, Urla, Post Bmy Charouda, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶38

---- Respondent

¶39

01/07/2022	Mr. Vinay Pandey, Advocate and Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Advocate for the respective petitioners.
	Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, Senior Advocate with Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate and Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. The instant review petition have been filed seeking review of the orders dated 11.04.2022, 29.03.2022 & 31.03.2022 passed in WPS Nos. 2560/2022, 2200/2022, 2066/2022, 2164/2022 & 2166/2022 respectively. A review petition of identical nature came up before this Court on 12.05.2022 in REVP No.62/2022 (Central Board of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization v. R. S. Sharma & another). The grounds raised by the petitioner seeking review are all identical in nature. In view of the same, this Court is inclined to take the same view in the present review petitions as well. Accordingly, the present review petitions stand rejected in terms of the order passed on 12.05.2022 in REVP No.62/2022. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE

01/07/2022

Mr. Vinay Pandey, Advocate and Mr. Anil S. Pandey,
Advocate for the respective petitioners.

Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Keshav
Dewangan, Advocate and Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate for the
respondent No.1.
Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate for the respondent No. 2.
The instant review petition have been filed seeking review of
the orders dated 11.04.2022, 29.03.2022 & 31.03.2022 passed in
WPS Nos. 2560/2022, 2200/2022, 2066/2022, 2164/2022 &
2166/2022 respectively.
A review petition of identical nature came up before this Court
on 12.05.2022 in REVP No.62/2022 (Central Board of Trustees
Employees Provident Fund Organization v. R. S. Sharma & another).
The grounds raised by the petitioner seeking review are all identical
in nature.
In view of the same, this Court is inclined to take the same
view in the present review petitions as well. Accordingly, the present
review petitions stand rejected in terms of the order passed on
12.05.2022 in REVP No.62/2022.
Sd/-
(P. Sam Koshy)
JUDGE

¶40

Ved

Central Board of Trustees v. Ram Lal Sharma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Central Board of Trustees v. Ram Lal Sharma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Central Board of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization Vs Sagun Lal Verma

Central Board of Trustees Vs Raghuvir Singh Ghritlehre

Central Board of Trustees Vs K.K. Naidu

Central Board of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization Vs Kunwar Singh Dewangan

Central Board of Trustees Vs Smt. Premila Naidu

Central Board of Trustees, Vs Jivan Lal Sannad