In MCRCA No. 91 of 2022, the Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the applicant's application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC, finding he was apprehending arrest for embezzlement of public funds in a sanitation scheme case punishable under IPC sections 409/34.
Anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 CrPC was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 91 of 2022
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Adv. For Respondent/State : Ms. Madhunisha Singh, Dy. A.G.
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
Order on Board
20.04.2022
2
were constructed. For each toilet a sum of Rs. 12,000/- was allotted for the beneficiary to be given as grant. However, he did not pay any amount to any of the beneficiaries thus embezzled a sum of approximately Rs.19,90,000/-. Based on this, offence was registered against the present applicant.
Sd/(Rajani Dubey) Judge
Ruchi
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail in offences punishable under Sections 409/34 IPC.
Whether the coordination of co-accused's bail grants the applicant anticipatory bail at this stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahesh Kumar Nag
The State of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station- Basna
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
