Mangesh Vaidya Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
This interlocutory order rejects a third anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 CrPC because the applicant failed to follow the previous order of this Court and no change in circumstances was found.
What did the court decide?
The application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
What the court decided
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 153 of 2022
- Mangesh Vaidya Sahu S/o Shri N.W. Vaidya Aged About 45 Years R/o Commercial Complex, Nehru Nagar (East) Police Station Supela, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
- State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Supela Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
| For Applicant | : Shri Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent/State | : Shri Soumya Rai, PL |
| For Respondent/Objector: | : Shri Kishan Lal Sahu, Advocate |
Hon’ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
Order On Board
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant who has filed multiple bail applications for the same offence without following prior orders.
Whether the repeated filing of bail applications despite the dismissal of previous ones warrants the rejection of the present application.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mangesh Vaidya Sahu
- respondent
State Of Chhattisgarh
Coram
Rajani Dubey
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- MCRCA/153/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court