Dhruv Kumar Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
In a matter where the applicant failed to appear and did not make any representation before this Court, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
In a matter where the applicant failed to appear and did not make any representation before this Court, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.CrC(A) No.355 of 2022
Dhruv Kumar Agrawal Son Of Shri Mahaveer Agrawal Aged About 48 Years R/ o Baradwar, P.S. Baradwar, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate Janjgir, District JanjgirChampa Chhattisgarh. ---- Non-Applicant
For Applicant: None. For Non-Applicant/State: Shri RM Solapurkar, G.A
Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J Order On Board
08.08.2022
also, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the Applicant
even when the case is called in the second round of hearing.
Petition for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Deepak Kuamr Tiwari) JUDGE
Priya
Dhruv Kumar Agrawal
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court