The appellant moved to withdraw the appeal against a judgment of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The High Court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MA No. 65 of 2019
Smt. Uma Agrawal W/o Jagdish Agrawal, aged about 60 years D/o Late Brijmohan Agrawal, R/o Near Gauri Shankar Mandir Raigarh Tahsil And District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
| ______________________________ For Appellant |
_____________________________________ : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent No.4 | : Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, Advocate |
| For respondent No.7/State | : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, P.L. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Order On Board
21.04.2022
Sd/-
(Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge
Saurabh
Smt. Uma Agrawal
Naresh Likhmaniya
Suresh Kumar Likhmaniya
Smt. Premlata Kediya
M/s J. P. Builders
Pavan Kumar Kediya
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
