Criminal revision under Section 145 Cr.P.C. dismissed for want of prosecution as neither party appeared to present their case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRR No. 522 of 2010
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners – None.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
12-08-2022
2
Sub Divisional Magistrate, Durg in Criminal Case No.509/2008 has been reversed.
2 . The matter pertains to the proceeding under Section 145 of the Cr.P.C. which was initiated in the year 2008. It appears that the parties are not interested in prosecution of the case as in both the rounds no one appeared on behalf of the parties.
3 . The matter pertains to the proceeding under Section 145 of the Cr.P.C. and no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners or the respondents. Therefore, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this criminal revision for want of prosecution. Accordingly, this criminal revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
Aadil
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pranat Lal Dani and others
Devendra Kumar Dani, Brijendra Kumar Dani and State of Chhattisgarh
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
