This writ petition challenging a land demarcation order was dismissed as infructuous. The court held that underlying civil suits regarding title and possession were pending, rendering this writ application unnecessary.
The writ petition was dismissed as having been rendered infructuous due to pending civil proceedings regarding title and possession.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 2998 of 2009
Versus
3.1 - A. Asha Agrawal, Wd/o. Late Girish Kumar Agrawal, Aged About, 48 Years,
3.2 - B. Avinash Agrawal, S/o. Late Girish Kumar Agrawal, Aged About, 23 Years
3.3 - C. Priyank Agrawal, S/o Late Girish Kumar Agrawal, Aged About 21 Years,
For Respondents : Shri Surfaraj Khan, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
10.08.2022
Page 2 of 2
Revenue.
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
Nadim
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding land demarcation proceedings is maintainable given pending second appeals in civil suits.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narendra Singh Chawla
Ramesh Kumar
Satish Kumar
Girish Kumar (Deleted)
Jyotish Kumar
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
