The applicant sought permission to withdraw a criminal revision challenging a Family Court order granting maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. The High Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the revision accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the criminal revision is granted and the revision is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Criminal Revision No. 521 of 2020
Presently at Nutan Chowk, Ramkrishna Enclave, B/6-203, Police Station Sarkanda, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.)
---- Non-Applicants
| For Applicant | : | Mr. Sourabh Sonwani, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For Non-Applicant | : | None |
| Hon’bl | e Shri | Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board |
21.09.2022
Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
vatti
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Amit Manuja
Smt. Mahi Manuja
Ku. Suhani Manuja
Ku. Shrishti Manuja
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
