Petitioners withdrew the petition with liberty to file a fresh one; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 312 of 2022
---- Petitioners
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Forest Range Officer, Forest Range Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.)
---- Respondent
For Petitioners : Shri Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Shri Gurudev I Sharan, Govt. Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order On Board
10/03/2022
Sd/--/-----/-/(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
Praveen
Siyaram Yadav and Ors.
State Of Chhattisgarh
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
