Allowed

Sunita Gedam v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC24 Sept 2021WPS/976/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this written order, the High Court quashed an impugned order dated 28.01.2014 affecting the petitioner's posting, directing the Collector to pass a fresh order within four weeks while keeping an interim order operational.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 28.01.2014 quashed; liberty granted to Collector to pass fresh order within four weeks; interim order dated 24.02.2014 to remain in force.

Sunita Gedam Vs State Of Chhattisgarh… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 976 of 2014

¶5

Sunita Gedam D/o T.R. Gedam, Aged About 42 Years Superintendent Of Triable Girls Ashram Kui, Block Development Pandariya (Govt. Service Upper Division Teacher), Civil And Revenue District Kabirdham, C.G.

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

¶9

2. Collector Kabirdham, District Kabirdham, C.G.

¶10

3. District Education Officer, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham, C.G.

¶11

4. Assistant Commissioner, Triable Development Kabirdham, District Kabirdham, C.G.

¶12

5. Ku. Manju Nagwanshi Superintendent Of Triable Girls Hostel Kui, Block Pandariya, District Kabirdham, C.G.

¶13

---- Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner :- Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate.
For State :- Mr. Soumya Rai, PL.

¶15

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶17

Order On Board

¶18

24/09/2021

¶19

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by interim order dated 24.02.2014 the petitioner is working as Superintendent of Tribal Girls Ashram Kui, District Kabirdham and the impugned order dated 28.01.2014 is liable to be set aside.

¶20

2. Learned State counsel opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶21

3. Since the petitioner is working on the post of Superintendent of Tribal Girls Ashram Kui, District Kabirdham by virtue of interim order dated 24.02.2014, for a fairly long time and petitioner continued at original place of posting by that interim order. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 28.01.2014 is quashed to the extent of the petitioner. However, liberty is granted to the Collector, Kabirdham, to pass a fresh order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks. Till passing of order by the

¶22

¶23

Collector, Kabirdham, in respect of posting
of the petitioner the interim order
24.02.2014 shall remain in force. The
petitioner is at liberty to file
representationbeforetheconcerned

¶24

Collector.

¶25

4. With the aforesaid observation / direction the instant writ petition stands disposed off.

¶26

Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge

¶27

Ankit

Sunita Gedam v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita Gedam v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri L.n.tyagi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Nageshwar Lal Nagpure Vs Janpad Panchayat Rajnandgaon and Ors.

Jagdish Kashyap Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Mirza Najiruddin Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Dr. Smt. Shubhra Goutam Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Smt. Avantika Tiwari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.