The High Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the District Education Officer within two weeks, which must be decided within four weeks. The court explicitly stated it had no opinion on the merits of the case.
Petitioner liberty to represent; Respondent No. 3 to decide within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 6877 of 2021
Rajendra Prasad Kaushik S/o Late Shri Bodhan Lal Kaushik Aged About 69 Years Retired Vyakhyata, Govt. Higher Secondary School Belpan Vikaskhand Takhatpur Niwasi Gram Hardi Thana Takhatpur, Jila Bilaspur C.G.
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
| --------------------------- For Petitioner |
------------ : |
---------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| Respondents | : | Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Dy. Govt. Advocate |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
14.12.2021
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal )
Judge
Santosh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to make a fresh representation regarding increment and pay scale benefits.
Whether the District Education Officer is directed to decide the petitioner's claim within a specific timeline.
Rajendra Prasad Kaushik
State Of Chhattisgarh
Secretary School Shiksha Vibhag
Jila Shiksha Adhikari Bilaspur
Vikaskhand Shiksha Adhikari
Sambhagiya Sanyukta Sanchalak
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Santosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
