Disposed

Parmanand Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC14 Dec 2021WPS/6876/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition regarding arrears of pay scale, the petitioner was granted liberty to make a representation to the Chief Executive Officer, who was directed to decide the matter within four weeks. The court explicitly reserved its opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to make representation to respondent No. 6 to decide within four weeks.

Parmanand Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

WPS No. 6876 of 2021

¶4

Parmanand Yadav S/o Shri Sonau Ram Yadav Aged About 43 Years Assistant Teacher (L. B.) Govt. Primary School Gangajal Block- Block Nawagarh District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh.

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶8

The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶9

The Director Panchayat And Rural Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶10

The Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Janjgir District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh.

¶11

The District Education Officer District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh.

¶12

The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh.

¶13

The Block Education Officer Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

¶14

----- Respondents

¶15

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner : Mr. Ashwani Shukla, Advocate Respondents : Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Dy. Govt. Advocate

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board

¶17

14.12.2021

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner has competed 8 years of service on the post of Assistant

¶19

Teacher (LB) and he is entitled for grant of arrears of payment of revised pay scale, which has not been considered and decided by respondent No. 6 till this date.

¶20

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation before respondent No. 6/ Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh within two weeks and the same shall be decided by respondent No. 6 within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.

¶21

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stand disposed of.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

(Sanjay K. Agrawal )

¶24

Judge

¶25

Santosh

Parmanand Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parmanand Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shailendra Kumar Mathur Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rishi Kumar Sao Vs Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Rajya Anryavasayee Sahkari Vitt Evam Vikas Nigam Raipur

Ashwani Kumar Patkar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Firat Ram Kurmi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rajendra Prasad Kaushik Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Afsana Vs State of Chhattisgarh