Disposed

Pushpendra Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Chhattisgarh HC16 Jun 2021WPS/5916/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition concerned a dispute where the petitioner, a Panchayat Karmi, alleged failure in joining due to a rival appointment. The Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Collector and directed the Collector to consider old and new representations within 30 days, disposing of the petition without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to move a fresh representation before the Collector within three weeks; Collector directed to consider representations and decide within 30 days. Petition disposed.

Pushpendra Singh Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 5916 of 2008

¶5

Pushpendra Singh, S/o Shri Shamsher Singh, Aged
about 34 years, Occupation Service Panchayat Karmi,
Gram Panchayat Ooghyaon, R/o Village Ooghyaon, P.S.
and Tahsil Sonhat, Distt. Korea, Chhattisgarh.

¶6

 ---Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Mantralaya, at DKS Building, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

2. The Collector, Korea, Distt. Korea, Chhattisgarh.

¶10

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Sonhat, Distt. Korea, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

4. The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Ooghyaon, P.S. and Tahsil Sonhat, Distt. Korea, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

--- Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner:-Mr. Vivek Verma, Advocate
For State:-Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Dy. A.G.

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶15

Order on Board (Through Video Conferencing)

¶16

16/06/2021

¶17

1.Heard.

¶18

¶19

2.Mr. Vivek Verma, learned counsel for the
petitioner, would submit that petitioner was
appointed on the post of 'Panchayat Karmi' by Gram
Panchayat, Ooghyaon, Tahsil Sonhat, District Korea,
but he has not been given joining and in the return
filed, it is the stand of respondent No. 4 that
another 'Panchayat Karmi' has been appointed by the
Gram Panchayat against which the petitioner made a
representation before the Collector, Korea on
06/10/2008 which has not been considered and
decided.

¶20

3. Be that as it may, petitioner is directed to move a fresh representation before the Collector, Korea within three weeks from today and the Collector, Korea is directed to consider the old as well as the fresh represenation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law and decide it within 30 days from the date of receipt of the representation.

¶21

4. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No cost(s). It Is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

¶22

Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge

¶23

Harneet

Pushpendra Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushpendra Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hc/Ro MD Hussain Vs Directior General of Police and Anr.

Kanhaiyalal Soni Vs Mangat Singh and Others

Kali Bai Vs Narottam

Bhagbati Bai Vs Hemlal Tamboli and Another

Ku.Bharati Vs the Collector and Ors.

Anantram Dead Through Lrs Vs Man Singh