The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed an appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on multiple hearing dates and was deemed uninterested in prosecuting the matter.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SA No. 86 of 2006
Kanhaiyalal Soni, Aged about 48 years, S/o
Manilal Soni, R/o Ganesh Market, First Floor,
Mahasamund, Tahsil and Distt. Mahasamund,
Chhattisgarh.
---Appellant
Versus
1. Mangat Singh, Aged about 50 years, S/o Buddh Singh Chawla, Profession Business, R/o Gurunanak Ward Mahasamund, Tahsil and Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.
2. Vyas Narayan Sharma, S/o Balaram Sharma, Ageda about 47 years, Profession Business, Khad Avam Beej Bhandar Ganesh Market, R/o Clubpara Mahasamund, Tahsil and Distt. Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.
--- Respondents
For Appellant :-None
For State:-Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Dy. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board (Through Video Conferencing)
15/06/2021
1. The matter was called up twice for hearing but none appeared on behalf of the appellant and it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting
2
the appeal. In these circumstances, this Court has
no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want
of prosecution.
2. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed
for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
Harneet
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the appellant.
Kanhaiyalal Soni
Mangat Singh
Vyas Narayan Sharma
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court