Disposed

Khik Ram Uraon v. State of Chhattigarh

Chhattisgarh HC20 Sept 2021WPS/4887/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction to consider his claim for absorption into the regular establishment as an Attendant after rendering 5+ years of contingent service. Court directed respondent authorities to take an appropriate decision within four months.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider petitioner's claim for absorption and communicate appropriate decision within four months.

Khik Ram Uraon Vs State of Chhattigarh — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 4887 OF 2021

¶5

• Khik Ram Uraon, S/o Shri Karmu Ram Uraon, aged about 43 years, posted as Attendant (Contingency Paid) at Outline Dispensary Lawsara, Block Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (CG)

¶6

... Petitioner

¶7

versus

¶8

1 . State of Chhattigarh, through the Secretary, Department of Veterinary Services, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur

¶9

(CG)

¶10

2 . The Director, Directorate of Veterinary Services, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (CG)

¶11

3 . The Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, District Janjgir-Champa

¶12

(CG)

¶13

4 . The Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, Veterinary Hospital Sakti, Block Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (CG)

¶14

5 . The Collector, District Janjgir-Champa (CG)

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate. For Respondents : Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. Govt. Advocate

¶17

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board [ 20/09/2021 ]

¶18

1. The limited relief that Petitioner seeks in the present Writ Petition is for an appropriate direction to Respondents to consider his claim for being absorbed in the regular establishment on the post of Attendant considering the length of services that he has rendered under the contingency establishment.

¶19

2. Contention of learned Counsel for Petitioner is that the Petitioner has completed more than 5 years of continuous uninterrupted services under the contingency establishment as an Attendant (Contingency Paid). The nature of duties discharged by Petitioner is exactly the same which is otherwise discharged by an Attendant of the regular establishment. That there are also posts available of Attendant under the Respondents.

¶20

¶21

3. Learned Counsel for Petitioner therefore submits that considering the length of services that Petitioner has put in and his services being satisfactory, the Respondents may consider his absorption under the regular establishment as an Attendant and for which the Petitioner has been repeatedly approaching the Authorities by making representations and also moving reminders of the same.

¶22

4. To this limited relief sought for by Petitioner, learned Deputy Government Advocate does not have any objection subject to the claim of Petitioner being considered in accordance with the rules, regulations and policy governing the field.

¶23

5. Considering the total facts and circumstances of the case, the present Writ Petition at this juncture is disposed of directing Respondents No.1 & 2 to take appropriate decision on the claim of Petitioner for absorption as an Attendant under the regular establishment of Respondents.

¶24

6. Let appropriate decision in this regard be taken by Respondents No.1 & 2 at the earliest, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order.

¶25

7. Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of.

¶26

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge

¶27

/sharad/

Khik Ram Uraon v. State of Chhattigarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khik Ram Uraon v. State of Chhattigarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avinash Tiwari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Ramsai Ijardar Vs Geeta Mukherjee

Ravindra Tiwari Vs South Eastern Coalfields Limited

State Of Chhattisgarh Vs Mahesh Ram Thawait

Rajendra Kumar Shukla Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Diwakar Prasad Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh