A. K. Chakraborty v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition under WPCR No. 230 of 2015, observing no need to examine the merits.
The High Court of Chhattisgarh permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition under WPCR No. 230 of 2015, observing no need to examine the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPCR No.230 of 2015
A. K. Chakraborty, S/o Late N.G. Chakraborty, Aged About 57 Years R/o Near Mesnet Qr. No. 9, Section -1, Shankar Nagar, Police Station Civil Line, Raipur Chhattisgarh---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, State Economic Offence Investigation And Anti Corrupation Bureau, Raipur Chhattisgarh , Chhattisgarh
2. Public Works Department, Through Principal Secretary, Mantralyaa, Mahandi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents
For PetitionerMr. Akshay Uppal, Advocate
For Respondent-StateMr. R. K. Bhagat, Dy. GA
Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
02/02/2021
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Judge
Nirala
A. K. Chakraborty
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, State Economic Offence Investigation And Anti Corrupation Bureau
Public Works Department, Through Principal Secretary, Mantralyaa, Mahandi Bhawan, Naya Raipur
Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, Sirpur Bhawan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court