Dismissed
Asarfilal v. Sardar Dharmvir Singh Khurana and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCSA/186/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
BILASPUR SA No. 186 of 2010 Asarfilal S/o…
What the court decided
AI extract
BILASPUR SA No. 186 of 2010 Asarfilal S/o…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SA No. 186 of 2010
Asarfilal S/o Munnalal aged about 60 years, R/o Navagarh Tahsil Navagarh, District Durg, C.G.---- Appellant
Versus
1. A) Sardar Dharmvir Singh Khurana aged about 50 years,
B) Sardar Bhupendra Singh Khurana, S/o
Jashwant Sinbgh Khurana, aged about 48
years,
C) Smt. Tejkunwar Wd/o Jashwant Singh
Khurana, agea about 65 years,
All Respondents No. A to C are R/o Navagarh
Tahsil Navagarh District Durg, C.G.
D) Smt. Reeta W/o Swaroop Singh Hora, aged
about 32 years, R/o Village Takhatpur,
District Bilaspur, C.G.
E) Ku. Satnami D/o Jaswanth aged about 25
years, R/o Village Navagarh Tahsil Navagarh
District Durg, C.G.
F) Smt. Trilochan W/o Jashbir Singh aged
about 42 years, R/o Kabirdham, District
Kabirdharm C.G.
2
2. Sardar Bhagat Singh Khurana, S/o Late Mela Singh Khurana, aged about 75 years,
3. Sardar Guruvachan Singh Khurana S/o Late Mela Singh Khurana, aged about 70 years, Cultivator & Shopkeeper,
4. Sardar Jagdish Singh S/o Late Mela Singh Khurana, aged about 65 years,
5. Harbansh Singh S/o Late Mela Singh Khurana, aged about 60 years,
6. Sardar Kishan Singh S/o Late Mela Singh Khurana, aged about 55 years,
All are cultivator & shopkeeper R/o Village
Navagarh Tahsil Navagarh District Durg, C.G.
7. Smt. Raj Gandhi W/o Ajit Singh Gandhi, aged about 40 years, R/o Khariyar Road, District Nayapara Orissa.
8. State of Chhattisgarh through Collector District Durg.
---- Respondents
For State :- Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
02/02/2021
1. In this case, earlier, counsel for the
3
appellant has died and SPC is required to be
sent to the appellant, however, the sole
appellant has also died. Since the appellant
has also died and there is no information
about the legal representatives of the
appellant, no SPC can be issued to the
appellant, who is no more.
2. Accordingly, the instant second appeal is
dismissed for want of prosecution. No order
as to cost(s).
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
Ankit
Asarfilal
Sardar Dharmvir Singh Khurana
Sardar Bhupendra Singh Khurana
Smt. Tejkunwar
Smt. Reeta
Ku. Satnami
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court