Beerbal Das v. Bharat Aluminum Company Ltd. and Ano.
Case brief
What is this about?
This second appeal, filed by an adopted son seeking pensionary benefits, was dismissed immediately without notice. The High Court held that both lower courts correctly found the appellant failed to prove the adoption deed, meaning no substantial question of law arose.
What the court decided
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Second Appeal No. 249 of 2010
Beerbal Das, aged 27 years, Son of Late Kamal Das, Presently residing at Dongaama, Kartala Distt. Korba (CG)
---- Appellant/Plaintiff
Versus
1. Bharat Aluminum Company Limited through Personal Manager
2. State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Korba (CG)
3. Nehru Das, aged 38 years, son of Mohar Das, Tahsil and Distt. Korba (CG)
---Respondents
For Appellant : Shri Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No.2/State : Shri Ravi Bhagat, Dy. Govt. Advocate
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the finding that the appellant failed to prove the adoption deed by both courts below constitutes a substantial question of law?
Whether the delay in advancing the reply by the appellant warranted the immediate dismissal of the second appeal?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Beerbal Das
- respondent
Bharat Aluminum Company Limited
- respondent
State of Chhattisgarh
- respondent
Nehru Das
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/249/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court