Dismissed
Suraj Bai and Others v. Krishna Kumar
Chhattisgarh HCSA/36/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
BILASPUR SA No. 36 of 2010 1. Suraj Bai aged…
What the court decided
AI extract
BILASPUR SA No. 36 of 2010 1. Suraj Bai aged…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SA No. 36 of 2010
1. Suraj Bai aged about 50 years D/o Late Ramdayal, R/o Village Bhothali Post-Somni, District Rajnandgaon, C.G.
2. Laxmi Bai, aged about 45 years, D/o Late Ramdayal, R/o Talapara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, C.G.
3. Savitri Bai, aged about 35 years, D/o Late Ramdayal, R/o Dhamapur, behind Sheetla Mandir, Bai Ka Bagicha Jabalpur,District Jabalpur, M.P.
4. Ghanshaym aged about 42 years, S/o Late Ramdayal, R/o Village Mohara, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon, C.G.
---- Appellants
Versus
Krishna Kumar aged about 40 years, S/o Kishori Lal, R/o Village Mohara, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, C.G.---- Respondent
For Appellants :- Mr. Aman Kesharwani, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
2
12/01/2021
1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits
that he has no instruction on behalf of the
appellants.
2. Accordingly, the instant second appeal is
dismissed as having no instruction to
learned counsel.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
Ankit
Suraj Bai et al.
Krishna Kumar
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court