In a bail application under Section 439 CrPC for alleged ATM theft, the High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the plea. Noting the applicant's involvement in similar past crimes and the rising trend of such offenses, the court held the applicant was not entitled to regular bail.
Bail application rejected; applicant ordered to remain in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No.6910 of 2021
....Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For Non-applicant : Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board
09.12.2021
2
Sd/(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
roshan/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the applicant charging him with theft from an ATM.
Whether the applicant's admission to similar past crimes precludes bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohd. Rasheed
State of Chhattisgarh
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
