Parasnath v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge dismissed the criminal appeal as not pressed in presence as the appellant indicated no desire to pursue the appeal.
The single judge dismissed the criminal appeal as not pressed in presence as the appellant indicated no desire to pursue the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRA No. 593 of 2012
Parasnath S/o Shri Suiyyaram, aged about 35 years, R/o Village: West Karkali, P.S & Tahsil: Kusmi, District: Surguja (C.G.)
---- Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh through S.H.O Kusmi, District: Surguja (C.G.)
---- Respondent
__________________________________________________________________ For Appellant : Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, Dy. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Order on Board
14.01.2021
1. Perused the P.U.D dated 18.11.2020, received from Central Jail, Ambikapur (Surguja) (C.G.) wherein, it has been reported that the Appellant has released from jail on 30.06.2018 after completion of his entire jail sentence imposed upon them by the concerned Trial Court.
2. Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that he doesn't want to press this appeal.
3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
(Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge
Saurabh
Parasnath S/o Shri Suiyyaram
State of Chhattisgarh through S.H.O Kusmi
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court