The High Court of Chhattisgarh pending appeals by persons convicted of robbery. The court affirmed the conviction but reduced the jail sentences to the period already undergone by the appellants.
Conviction affirmed. Jail sentences reduced to the period already undergone by the appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Criminal Appeal No. 1435 of 2000
---- Appellants
Versus
State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh)
---- Respondent
AND
Criminal Appeal No. 1465 of 2000
---- Appellants
Versus
State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh)
---- Respondent
For Appellants : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, Dy. Advocate General
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
Judgment on Board
12/01/2021
2
being decided by this common judgment.
3
4
view that the ends of justice would be met if, while upholding the conviction imposed upon the Appellants, the jail sentenced awarded to them is reduced to the period already undergone by them.
Sd/- (Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge
Rahul
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the jail sentence awarded to the appellants requires modification in view of the period already undergone?
Whether the conviction under Section 395 IPC should be upheld?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Samaru Bareth
Babulal
Sukhram
Sukhnath
Ajit Kumar
Khikhram Kurre
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
