Petitioner in a contempt case was absent on hearing. The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the case for want of prosecution.
Contempt case dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Contempt Case No. 1135 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Shri Bhuwnesh Yadav Commissioner/secretary Public Health And Family Welfare Department 3rd Indirawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Pin Code 492005.
2. Shri Bijay Kumar Mohanti Accountant General Chhattisgarh, Zero Point Baloda Bazar Road, P.O. Vidansabha, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Pin Code 492005
3. Dr. Siddheshwar Prasad Ware Chief Medical Officer And Health Officer Mahasamund, Near Collector Office, Mohlibatra Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, Pin Code 493445
---Respondents
For Petitioner : None present For Respondents : Shri Ravi Bhagat, Dy. Govt. Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
03.02.2021.
1. None present for the petitioner even when the case is called for hearing in the second round.
2. In this circumstance, this Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the contempt case for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
SD/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE
Bini
S.R. Shrivas
Shri Bhuwnesh Yadav
Shri Bijay Kumar Mohanti
Dr. Siddheshwar Prasad Ware
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
