Louis Kumar Ludgar Lakra v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6945 of 2017…
What did the court decide?
Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. No. 2, application for withdrawal, is allowed.
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6945 of 2017…
Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. No. 2, application for withdrawal, is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 6945 of 2017
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
| 04/02/2020 | Mr. Roop Naik, Counsel for the Petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State. | |
| Heard on I.A. No. 2, application for withdrawal of the writ petition. |
|
| On due consideration and for the reasons stated in the I.A. No.2, the same is allowed. |
|
| Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn**.** | |
| Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
Yasmin.j
Louis Kumar Ludgar S/o Late Shri J. Lakra
State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department and Commerce and Industry
The Director Of Industries
Shri Kartikey Goel
Ajeet Kumar Toppo
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court