The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted liberty to the petitioner to make a representation for the grant of Kramonnati reliance on relevant circulars and judgments, directing the authority to decide it within four months.
Liberty granted to make a representation to be decided by the competent authority within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 434 of 2020
---- Petitioner Versus
| ---- Respondents | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner | : Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate |
| For Respondent/ State | : Mr. Kapil Maini, PL |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order On Board
03.02.2020
K.K. Roy (2004 SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (supra) top which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection.
Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Yasmin
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to liberty to make a representation for grant of Kramonnati.
Whether the representation should be decided by the competent authority within a specified period.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
R.S. Verma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and OthersReferred¶13
R.S. Verma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (W.P.(S) No.2805/2002 by judgment and order dated 29.08.2006
State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. RoyReferred¶13
State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004 SCW/1) · Who else cites this
Sushila Dhruw
State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
Yasmin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
