Disposed

Narmada Prasad Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC21 Jan 2020WPS/450/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants a specific direction to respondents to ascertain if the petitioner receives one annual increment while calculating his pension upon retirement. The petition was disposed of with a direction to authorities to consider a cited judgment.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents 1 to 3 to consider the case for grant of one annual increment to the last salary for quantifying pension, considering the judgment in P. Ayyamperumal.

Narmada Prasad Sharma Vs State of… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 450 of 2020

¶5

Narmada Prasad Sharma S/o Late Poshan Sharma Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Nawagaon, Post Nawagaon (Farda), Police Station Bori, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

The Accountant General Government Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

The Joint Director Treasury, Accounts, And Pension, Raipur Division, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

The Director Directorate Of Ayurved, Yog And Natural Medical, Unani Siddh Avam And Homyo (Ayush), Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

The District Ayurved Officer Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶13

---- Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner	: Shri Shantanu Parmanand, Advocate
For Respondents/ State	: Shri Kunal Das, P.L.
For Respondent No. 2	: Shri R.K. Gupta, Advocate

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

¶16

Order On Board

¶17

21/01/2020

¶18

The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is for grant of the benefit of one annual increment while fixing pension and other retiral dues payable to the petitioner.

¶19

According to the petitioner, the petitioner has retired from service on 30^th of June, 2017. Since he has retired from service w.e.f. 30.06.2017, he would be entitled for the annual increment that would be payable to him for the

¶20

¶21

period between 1^st of June, 2016 to 30^th of June, 2017 as the date of annual increment payable to the petitioner is 1^st of July. Therefore, according to the counsel for the petitioner, while quantifying pension and other retiral dues, the annual increment which the petitioner became entitled for having worked till 30^th June, 2017 has to be added to the last pay and other allowances also.

¶22

Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, let the respondents 1 to 3 consider the case of the petitioner for grant of one annual increment to the last salary which the petitioner has received for the purpose of quantifying pension and other retiral dues. While deciding the claim of the petitioner, the respondents shall take into consideration the judgment of the Division Bench of Madras High Court in the case of P. Ayyamperumal vs. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal and others decided on 15.09.2017 in W. P. No. 15732 of 2017.

¶23

With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Goutam Bhaduri Judge

¶26

Jyoti

Narmada Prasad Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narmada Prasad Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhirampuri Goswami Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Purain Bai Thakur Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Badri Prasad Sahu Vs Janak Prasad Pathak

Smt. Anita Hirwani Vs State of Chhattisgarh

G.l.chandrakar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Tarachand Choudhary Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.